FCC Chief Defends Review of Wireless Deals
FCC Chief Defends Review of Wireless Deals
Earlier this week Julius Genachowski, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission defended the agency’s scrutiny of latest wireless industry related deals saying that ensuring correct business practices and the spirit of competition does not mean that the Commission is averse to satisfy growing public demand for mobile services and freeing up additional spectrum.
He further added that some people feel that the Commission’s decision to review recent deals in the wireless industry is somehow causing a shortage of spectrum and the FCC Internet deals review has led to a service provider increasing its broadband subscription rates. But the spectrum availability hasn’t changed and the FCC is taking steps to increase to add new spectrum in the market.
At the CTIA’s annual summit in New Orleans, he provided a hint that the FCC is involved in efforts to free more spectrum to meet growing consumer demands. He further remarked that the perception of competition leads to spectrum inefficiency is wrong as historically competition channels investments in efficient technologies and business models evolve which benefit both service providers and their customers. FCCs track record clearly shows that it is diligent in exercising its responsibilities.
These comments did not find favor with AT&T which had proposed a takeover bid on T-Mobile USA last year but it was disallowed by the FCC. The company said that the merger would have created an additional spectrum by combining the holdings of and networks of the two companies. Without additional spectrum prices will rise.
Jim Cicconi, AT&T’s senior Vice President stated last week that the FCC should allow companies to buy spectrum from those companies which do not need it.
The FCC is currently reviewing a proposed deal involving Verizon and a group of cable companies wherein Verizon will buy spectrum from this group and in return it will market few of their products and services. The deal is fiercely being opposed by consumer advocacy groups.








